How did Jesus treat the Old Testament?
If Jesus is God’s vindicated authority, His view of Scripture matters. The historical question is whether Jesus really treated Israel’s Scriptures as God’s authoritative Word.
You are viewing a shareable lesson page. Return to the full course to have this study count toward your progress and mark it complete there.
Follow Jesus' teaching about Scripture through the apostles, the New Testament, and the final conclusion.
The resurrection gives Jesus’ historically established teaching unique authority. The first revelation question is therefore straightforward: how did Jesus Himself treat the Scriptures already received by Israel?
What did Jesus think about the Bible?
Jordan sees the next move. “If that is where the evidence leads, then I understand why what Jesus teaches matters.”
He points to a Bible on the table. “But you still have to get from Jesus to this.”
You agree. “Then we should start with the Scriptures Jesus already had.”
Jordan asks, “And how do you know Jesus really thought those writings were God’s Word instead of people later putting that view on Him?”
We reach the Old Testament through Jesus: historically, He receives Israel’s Scriptures as God’s authoritative Word, and His resurrection gives His view decisive weight.
If God vindicated Jesus, it matters what He thought of Scripture. The historical question is whether the Gospels give us good reason to believe this really was His view.
What did Jesus believe about Scripture?
So far we've argued for the authority of Jesus without assuming the Bible is inspired. Now we can ask how Jesus Himself treated the Scriptures of Israel.
I would not build the whole case on one verse. Look at the way Jesus speaks about Scripture throughout the Gospels. Across the Gospel traditions, Jesus appeals to Israel’s Scriptures in argument, treats what is written as binding, corrects people for misunderstanding it, and explains His own mission through it. That is exactly the kind of pattern we would expect from a first-century Jewish teacher who regarded these writings as God’s authoritative revelation.
Matthew 4 repeatedly has Jesus answer temptation with “It is written.” In Mark 7, Jesus can contrast human tradition with the “word of God.” In Matthew 19, He quotes Genesis and speaks of the words in the text as what the Creator said. John 10 records Jesus saying that Scripture cannot be broken. Luke 24 presents Him reading His own mission through the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms.
Individual passages can still be discussed historically, but the conclusion does not hang on any one of them. Jesus’ high view of Israel’s Scriptures appears broadly enough that it is difficult to explain His basic posture as a late Christian invention. It also fits naturally within the Jewish world in which He lived.
That gives the resurrection real importance for Scripture. If God vindicated Jesus, and we have good historical reason to think Jesus received Israel’s Scriptures as God’s Word, then His view of those Scriptures becomes a reason for us to receive them as well.
Which books are we talking about? Jesus did not carry a modern English Bible with thirty-nine Old Testament books arranged in our order. Jewish Scripture was commonly organized as the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings and counted fewer books because books we divide—such as Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, and the twelve Minor Prophets—were grouped together. The Protestant Old Testament contains the same books as today's Jewish Hebrew Bible, divided and arranged differently. That present-day correspondence does not by itself tell us precisely which books Jesus counted as Scripture.
There is still a question about which books belonged to that collection. Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians disagree about certain additional books, often called the Apocrypha or Deuterocanonical books. The strongest historical conclusion is that Jesus received Israel's Scriptures as God's authoritative Word. Jewish evidence around this period, including the prologue to Sirach and the testimony of Josephus, supports an established collection of sacred writings. Its exact boundaries still need historical examination, especially where Christian traditions disagree about additional books.
So the argument has now reached the Old Testament without assuming its inspiration at the beginning: the God who raised Jesus vindicated Him, and the historically grounded teaching of Jesus receives Israel’s Scriptures as God’s Word.
Bottom line: Jesus consistently receives Israel’s Scriptures as God’s authoritative Word, and there is good historical reason to think this really was His view. If God vindicated Jesus, His view gives us good reason to receive the Old Testament He received.
Think about it: Why can the Protestant Old Testament have thirty-nine books if the Hebrew Bible is often counted as twenty-four?
Jesus treated Scripture as God’s Word
You show Jordan how Jesus uses Scripture. When tempted, He answers, “It is written.” He describes words from Genesis as what the Creator said, and He calls the Scriptures the “word of God.”
These examples come from different settings, and together they give good historical reason to think Jesus really received Israel’s Scriptures as authoritative. If God raised Jesus, His view of Scripture matters.
Jordan nods. “Then it is not enough for me to say I respect Jesus but reject the Old Testament as just another religious book.”
He thinks for a moment. “But Jesus did not hand His followers a New Testament. How do we get from Him to those books?”
Use what you learned in a different situation
A friend says, “I can follow Jesus and still treat the Old Testament as nothing more than ancient Jewish religious literature.” How would you answer without assuming the Old Testament’s inspiration first?
The full course lets you write your response, compare it with a model, and track your progress.
Practice this inside the full courseQuestions this argument still has to face
“You are using the Gospels to prove the Bible again.”
We are using the Gospel documents historically, not assuming their inspiration. The question is whether the broad pattern of Jesus’ treatment of Scripture is historically well supported. If it is, then the authority comes from the Jesus whom the resurrection has already vindicated.
“Maybe Jesus was just a man of His time who shared His culture’s mistaken view of Scripture.”
That response is possible only by limiting Jesus’ authority. But the argument has already given independent reason to see Him as God’s vindicated authority. If that earlier case succeeds, His settled view of Scripture cannot simply be dismissed as a cultural mistake.
“Does Jesus prove the exact Protestant Old Testament?”
Jesus receives the Jewish Scriptures as God’s authoritative Word. The Protestant Old Testament corresponds in content to the Hebrew collection, though the books are divided and arranged differently. The history of the canon and the status of additional books should still be examined rather than hidden.
Use this in a real conversation
- Start with the pattern of Jesus’ use of Scripture rather than immediately arguing about one favorite proof text.
- Keep two questions separate: what Jesus believed about Scripture, and which books belong to the Old Testament canon.
- Do not pretend the Protestant-Catholic canon question is imaginary. Explain why the course follows the Hebrew collection and give the learner sources for deeper study.
This lesson establishes Jesus’ broad historical posture toward Israel’s Scriptures and explains the Protestant identification of those Hebrew books with the Old Testament. It does not pretend that every later canon dispute can be settled by one saying of Jesus.
Sources for further study
- Biola | Revisiting Jesus’ Attitude toward the Old Testament: Directly addresses whether Jesus’ view of Scripture can be established historically without first assuming Gospel inspiration.
- The Gospel Coalition | The Biblical Canon: Surveys first-century evidence from Jesus, Josephus, and Philo for an established Jewish scriptural corpus.
- Ligonier | The Scriptures: Explains the Law-Prophets-Writings structure and the relationship between the Hebrew Bible’s twenty-four-book count and the Protestant thirty-nine-book Old Testament.
Continue in the full course to track your progress and explore more lessons.
Return to full course for more lessons