Did Jesus authorize apostles to speak for Him?
The New Testament cannot be reached simply by saying Jesus was authoritative. We need historical reason to think He appointed witnesses to carry His teaching after Him.
You are viewing a shareable lesson page. Return to the full course to have this study count toward your progress and mark it complete there.
Follow Jesus' teaching about Scripture through the apostles, the New Testament, and the final conclusion.
Jesus receives Israel’s Scriptures as God’s Word. But the New Testament did not yet exist during most of His earthly ministry. How do we get from the authority of Jesus to authoritative writings after Him?
Jesus did not hand them twenty-seven books
Jordan sees the problem immediately. “Okay. Jesus had the Old Testament. But He never handed the disciples a New Testament.”
You agree. “Right. So we should not jump there.”
“Then what comes next?”
You tell him that Jesus did leave something before there was a New Testament collection: authorized witnesses.
Jordan says, “Then show me that the apostles really came from Jesus and were not just later church leaders claiming authority for themselves.”
Jesus did not leave Christianity without authorized witnesses. The apostles stand between the authority of the risen Christ and the New Testament writings that preserve the apostolic witness.
We cannot skip from Jesus' authority straight to a table of contents. First we have to establish that He chose and sent witnesses to carry His teaching.
From Jesus’ authority to authorized witnesses
Jesus never handed His followers a bound New Testament. So how do we get from His authority to the twenty-seven books we have today? Start with the people He sent to speak for Him: the apostles.
The existence of the Twelve is not a late idea that appears only after Christianity had developed. The Synoptic Gospels repeatedly describe Jesus choosing a distinct group of twelve, sending them out, and giving them a representative role. Paul, writing earlier than the Gospels, can refer to “the Twelve” in the resurrection tradition he received. That gives us an early line of evidence that this group belonged to the movement from the beginning.
Why twelve? In a Jewish setting it naturally points to the twelve tribes of Israel and fits Jesus’ announcement of God’s kingdom and the restoration of God’s people. It is not a random administrative detail.
The traditions also present these men as more than ordinary students. Jesus sends them to preach His message and act in His name. Matthew and Luke preserve sayings in which receiving Jesus’ messengers is connected with receiving Jesus Himself. The exact wording of individual commission sayings can be discussed, but the broader pattern is early and widespread: Jesus selected representatives to continue His witness.
Paul's letters give us a link to these earliest leaders. He distinguishes the apostles who came before him from his own later commission, and he names James, Peter, and John as recognized leaders. We have already seen his report of meeting Peter and James. This was a recognized group in the first Christian generation, not an office invented by a much later church.
The apostles did not claim authority apart from Jesus. Their authority came from Him. The apostles matter because of the One who sent them. They do not replace Jesus. They bear witness to Him and teach in His name. But the commission of an apostle and the authority of a particular written book are two different claims. We must show that the writing really carries that apostolic witness.
That brings us to the next question. Which writings really carry the apostles' witness, how did the early churches recognize them, and can we recover what they wrote?
Bottom line: There is good historical reason to think Jesus established an authorized apostolic witness to carry His teaching. The next question is how that witness reaches the writings of the New Testament.
Think about it: What has this lesson established—and what has it not established yet?
Jesus left authorized witnesses
You explain that Jesus chose the Twelve and sent them out to speak and act in His name. The Gospels describe that commission, and Paul's early letters show the Twelve and other recognized apostles were already part of the earliest movement.
That does not mean every person who later claimed apostolic authority had it. The claim we can defend is that Jesus established authorized witnesses whose teaching was meant to carry His message.
Jordan nods. “So there is a link between Jesus and the people who carried His teaching. That makes more sense than saying the church invented their authority later.”
Then he asks, “How do we know which writings really came from those witnesses?”
Use what you learned in a different situation
Someone says, “Jesus may have been authoritative, but Paul and the other apostles were just later church leaders speaking for themselves.” How would you respond?
The full course lets you write your response, compare it with a model, and track your progress.
Practice this inside the full courseQuestions this argument still has to face
“The church just gave certain leaders authority after Jesus was gone.”
The evidence for a distinct apostolic group is earlier than a later developed church structure. Paul already knows of the Twelve and recognized apostles, and the Gospel traditions consistently connect their role to Jesus Himself.
“Why should Paul count if he was not one of the original Twelve?”
Paul does not pretend to be one of the original Twelve. He grounds his apostleship in a later commission from the risen Jesus and interacts with the earlier apostles, who recognized his mission. His case is distinct and should be argued as such.
“Even if Jesus authorized apostles, that does not prove the New Testament.”
Correct. This lesson is only the bridge to apostolic authority. The next question is which writings genuinely carry that apostolic witness and how the church recognized them.
Use this in a real conversation
- Do not jump from Jesus’ authority straight to a twenty-seven-book canon. Establish the apostolic bridge first.
- Use Paul carefully: he is not one of the Twelve, but his early letters are valuable evidence that recognized apostolic authority already existed.
- Keep delegated authority clear. The apostles are authoritative because of Christ, not because the church later promoted them.
This lesson establishes the historical case for a Christ-authorized apostolic witness. It does not yet establish the complete New Testament canon or claim that every early Christian writer had apostolic authority.
Sources for further study
- Ligonier | What Is an Apostle?: Explains the distinction between a disciple and a commissioned apostolic representative and the delegated nature of apostolic authority.
- Ligonier | The Authority of the Apostles: Traces the argument from Jesus’ authority to those He commissioned to speak in His name.
- Mark 3:13–19; 1 Corinthians 15:3–8; Galatians 1–2: Provides early and varied evidence for the Twelve, recognized apostles, and Paul’s relationship to the earlier apostolic witnesses.
Continue in the full course to track your progress and explore more lessons.
Return to full course for more lessons